![]() ![]() The application is extremely processor intensive, and in this instance we used the standard, built in benchmark but set it across multiple threads. AMD FX-8350Īnd now Sisoft’s Sandra’s Multi-Media benchmarking: AMD FX-8350ģ21.69 Int X16 / 200.42 Floating Point / 112 / Double X8Ĥ01.11 INT X16 / 393.98 F loating Point / 226.11 Double X8ġ57.4 INT X16 / 198.9 Floating Point / 113.9 Double X8Ī popular ray tracing application used by artists to create beautiful and realistic 3d images also used by reviewers who need to test out a processors ability to render said images. A similar story as above – the FX sits right between Intel’s two popular choices. Processor Arithmetic – I think it’s pretty self explanatory: how fast can the processor calculate maths. The FX-8350 reached 23272 MIPS, slightly below that of a 4770K (at 4.1GHZ) which scored 23930 in this test. The built in benchmark uses a 32MB test as a ‘standard’ and thus the higher the MIPS the better. It’s highly multithreaded, and focuses on Integer workloads (which as we’ve discussed above, is the Vishera’s speciality) all while removing the IO system from the equation. ![]() Starting out with 7-zip, which is used for compression or decompression. With that in mind, we’ve put together a series of benchmarks which primarily focus on multi-threading performance. While some people buy a high powered PC for just gaming (you lucky soul), many use their PC for work too. Unfortunately, because of time constraints we’d not had time to redo some of the 4770K tests which were done when the CPU was overclocked to 4.2GHZ, so please bare in mind that Intel’s platform technically has a slight clock speed advantage in these tests. We’ll tinker with overclocking in this article, but we’ll focus on it in another article and choose a more robust cooling solution then.Ĭomparison systems – we’ll be using a couple of comparison systems – based around Intel’s I7 4770K. We’ll also be running the default Heatsink and Fan for this build, which does a pretty respectable job of cooling the processor. For the rest of the PC, we’re running a Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 motherboard (it’s a really nice bit of kit for the money, review coming soon), 8GB DDR3 1866MHZ and as for software – all games and software are their latest patched version. We’ll be running Windows 10 pre-release, since it grants us access to DX12, and DX11 performance is identical to older versions of Windows. Review Setup and NotesĪs mentioned in the opening paragraphs of this review, we’ll be focusing primarily on Multi-threaded performance, but naturally we’ll include tests designed to stress a single core too – including games. With the new generation of API’s out, it’s actually helped AMD’s processors become good choices for gamer’s looking to upgrade this year and have their rigs last for some time, particularly if they’re on a budget, and also would like to do content creation (for example). If you’re buying AMD’s FX lineup for multithreading, is it a good purchase? AMD’s pricing for their products has been rather aggressive of late – with their R9 2xx series cards reduced heavily in price, and currently the FX8350 is available on Amazon for about 127 pounds, it makes a very compelling case for itself compared to Intel’s £178 I5 4690K.ĪMD have made it rather clear they’re targeting Intel’s I5 range (both in pricing and their reviewer’s guide). The FX 8350 is fully unlocked, and just like Intel’s ‘k’ series (for example, the 4670K) signifies you’re free to manipulate the processors base clock several ways – including raising or lowering the processors internal multiplier. AMD have opted to include 8MB of level 3 cache, and 1024 Cache (KB/core) for the level 2 cache. So, in the of the FX 8350, the processor handles eight threads and runs at 4GHZ (assuming no overclocking). Remember, computers operate on pure maths, and Integers are whole numbers, so for example, “2” is an integer, while something like 2.13414 would be a float. According to AMD, about 90 percent of the ‘average’ desktop calculations will be Integer based. The Piledriver architecture is based on ‘modules’, with each module comprised of two Integer Cores and one Floating point core. The chip is built on a 32nm process (by GlobalFoundries). A complete Vishera processor measures 315 square mm, and packs in 1.2 billion transistors. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core before making a decision buy this processor or not.At it’s heart, the FX 8350 Vishera is based on the Piledriver architecture, a successor to Bulldozer. AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core - all dataĪMD FX-8350 Eight-Core Processor ComparisonsĪll the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. ![]() AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core specs and review. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |